New rubric

code assigned on save · starts as Draft

Rubric details

Title *

Type

Scale

attainment threshold %

Weighted criteria (weights must total 100%)

Not linked to a course or assessment yet. · Snapshot of TPL-ESSAY v1 (later template edits do not change this rubric).

Criteria × performance levels

Rubric matrix: criteria in rows, performance levels in columns
Criterion	Level 1 label Excellent minimum %–Excellent maximum %%	Level 2 label Good minimum %–Good maximum %%	Level 3 label Satisfactory minimum %–Satisfactory maximum %%	Level 4 label Developing minimum %–Developing maximum %%
Criterion 1 title Category Weight %%	Argument and thesis — Excellent descriptorClear, original, sustained argument	Argument and thesis — Good descriptorClear argument, mostly sustained	Argument and thesis — Satisfactory descriptorArgument present but uneven	Argument and thesis — Developing descriptorArgument unclear or missing
Criterion 2 title Category Weight %%	Use of evidence — Excellent descriptorWide, well-integrated evidence	Use of evidence — Good descriptorRelevant evidence, some integration	Use of evidence — Satisfactory descriptorLimited evidence	Use of evidence — Developing descriptorLittle or no evidence
Criterion 3 title Category Weight %%	Organisation and language — Excellent descriptorLogical, fluent, accurate	Organisation and language — Good descriptorMostly logical and accurate	Organisation and language — Satisfactory descriptorSome lapses in structure/language	Organisation and language — Developing descriptorHard to follow

Weights total 100% ✓

Add criteria in bulk (one title per line)

Checks

Warning: No CLO links yet — link the rubric to an assessment to map CLOs.

Bands are whole percentages, highest level first, contiguous from 100% to 0% (convention pending WOU confirmation). Descriptors are free text; checks never judge academic quality.

Cancel